You have now said so many things over the course of this discussion that it would be tedious to go through them all indicating whether I agree, disagree or am unable to comment. However, I understand the thrust of your claim to be that the site referred to plays on a widespread male desire to possess female sexuality/queerness. I have no hestistation in accepting that.

It seems to me that you discredit a perfectly good argument by unnecessarily gender polemical language and by responding to perfectly reasonable comments with argumentum ad capslock.