painting: dragon
Sep. 27th, 2006 05:05 pmA commission for
mejoff and
oxfordgirl - or rather, for the latter's mother, whose birthday present this is part of. Her father is organising a sort of Aladdin's cave of treasure, guarded by a dragon.
Given that the painted dragon is intended to be guarding actual physical treasure, the dimensions of the commission were quite specific - it needed to be landscape, at least two feet wide, with the hoard about 30cm at the base and about 20cm at its highest point. The dragon needed to be in the foreground, with no empty cave between the viewer and the dragon. These dimensions actually lead to a very tall hoard; far steeper than a pile of gold coins would naturally be without sliding down into a shallower heap. I tried to make it make sense by suggesting that the gold was pouring through a gap in the cave, with the dragon on top of the river of gold, but I'm not sure that I managed to make that clear. I also had a few misunderstandings about whether the dragon or the hoard should be in the foreground before getting things sorted out in my head - was the hoard receding and the dragon on top of it, in the middle distance, or were the hoard and dragon meant to be life-size, and the latter very small and cute, rather than big and fearsome and some distance away? (The latter, apparently, which made more sense.) There weren't any specifications regarding the dragon, other than that it had to be pretty.
This wasn't only my first commission to such precise geometric specifications, it was also my first dragon. To my dismay, I realised that I'd lost my copy of The Discovery of Dragons by Graeme Base, a beautiful big hardback book filled with gorgeous colour plates of dragons from all over the world, as discovered by a series of humorous fictional explorers. I loved that book, and without it I had no idea how to start working out how dragons were put together save looking at the covers of Anne McCaffrey books (which are not only the style of a particular artist, but also a particular futuristic species; I was aiming for a traditional Nordic dragon) or possibly photoshopping horses, seahorses, and lizards together to see what happened.
Thankfully, I didn't have to resort to that because the internet came to my rescue. This dragon owes its heritage not only to Smaug (of course), but to the beautiful designs of Allison Theus and Anne Stokes (of Wizards of the Coast fame), who inspired and informed many of my anatomical and stylistic decisions. I'm telling you, working out musculature for fictional creatures in tense postures when you aren't a particularly good imaginative artist (I'm not, I can't draw anything from imagination, I need light and shadow to copy) is not easy. The pectorals of this beastie alone took me almost a whole day. Who knew dragons had six pectoral muscles? I didn't, until I painted her with four and realised it didn't look right.
She's definitely a she, but she hasn't told me her name yet. I think her new keepers will be the ones to decide, but if you have any good ideas feel free to suggest them :)


"Untitled (dragon)", 2006
Oil on Canvas, 24" x 18"
(By the time she was collected this morning she was still slightly too wet to scan safely.
no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:06 pm (UTC)Were you able to use *any* consumate v's?
no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:29 pm (UTC).
.
.
Yes, I meant "in line". *embarrassed*
no subject
on 2006-09-27 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:15 pm (UTC)There are consummate Vs in the hoard, masquerading as gemstones.
no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:18 pm (UTC)I'm glad you like her :)
no subject
on 2006-09-27 04:32 pm (UTC)If I had the money I'd commission something from you *looks wistful*
no subject
on 2006-09-27 05:49 pm (UTC)I didn't consciously base them on bat wings, but clearly they belong more to that family than any other. I thought the spines adding extra support were definitely necessary, though, given the mass of the things involved.
I'm good value, I think. (I charged £200 for this, and have been told by several people that it's worth more, but they weren't the client, so I suppose their estimation has limited relevance.) I'm also happy to be paid in alcohol and shoes :D
no subject
on 2006-09-28 06:17 pm (UTC)FWIW, I think the foreground wing makes more anatomical sense than the background one, but I am not a anatomist and am definitely not an expert!
One day, if I ever have £200 to spend on a painting and know what sort of thing I'd want, I'd commission something from you :D
no subject
on 2006-09-27 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-27 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-28 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-28 06:41 am (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-28 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-28 08:27 am (UTC)but the treasure pile is confusing. if i didn't know there were specified hoard dimensions i'd be very confused and think it looked a bit silly. it would be really interesting to see a picture of it in the final guarding location as then it might make more sense.
i wish i could commission you to do some pictures like
this (http://kobato.spur.ne.jp/gallery/ico_07.htm)
and
this (http://kobato.spur.ne.jp/gallery/ico_11.htm)
from this artist's site (http://kobato.spur.ne.jp/gallery_f.htm).
i really want an ICO painting. man i hope i did those links right.
no subject
on 2006-09-28 12:21 pm (UTC)... Those pictures are gorgeous. Wow. <3 If Nick's ever looking for a birthday present for you ... :)
no subject
on 2006-09-28 11:02 am (UTC)no subject
on 2006-09-28 12:24 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-10-12 11:46 am (UTC)