painting: The Stranger
Nov. 25th, 2006 05:57 pmAnother Friday afternoon painting. It's a good habit for me to get into: I'm bored of work by Friday, so doing a new, smallish painting is much more interesting and engaging than plodding on through the same projects I've been working on all week. It sets a strict time limit (since I normally have plans on Friday evenings), which is a good exercise because I tend towards the ambitious and perfectionistic, and a finished project is a wonderful way to start the weekend. Both this and last week's have been in my new sketchpad of primed paper, which is also strangely helpful. In my head painting on canvas is big and hard and complicated and time-consuming. Painting in a sketchpad is somehow psychologically liberating - it doesn't mean the result is worse, just that I'm in a more experimental headspace, I'm not hung up on being perfectly realistic, or sensibly commercial, I can just play with ideas. This week's idea is colour. I suspect this might be a recurring theme.
Click on the image for bigness. This is for sale as usual; email me (helenic at gwydion dot net) or comment if interested - SOLD

The Stranger
Oil on Primed Paper, 10 x 14"
Some notes:
- I had the idea for this painting in bed on Tuesday night; it arrived as all my ideas do, whole and detailled and without explanation, leaving me only to mentally zoom in on the image and work out what's going on in it. In this case, I'm still not sure. Is it a latecomer to the party? Is it Death? Is it a Jedi? Who can tell?
- I'm not happy with the shadow figures. Originally the idea was to represent the distortion effect you get with shadows, making them elongated and faint at the edges, but after I'd got the yellows and oranges perfect I was loathe to start trying to blend black into them, so the shadows stayed solid. Plus they turned out thicker than I'd planned, and without ruining the colours underneath I couldn't undo any brushstrokes. So now they look more like symbols of people or cavepaintings than realistic shadows. But I'm not sure that's a bad thing.
- The sky is upside down, and I didn't realise this until afterwards: the treeline should be in silhouette, and the horizon should be light blue/teal, darkening to indigo at the zenith. Maybe it's pre-dawn? Or maybe it's just REALLY TRIPPY (I prefer to call this "magic realist").
- There are lots more tiny stars at the top that didn't show up once I shrank the scan. Boo. You'll have to imagine them.
- This painting reminds me a bit of the art of
lisafalzon, who is one of my favourite artists and who (unlike me) uses bright colours a lot. So, thankyou Lisa for being so consistently and imaginatively groundbreaking, and I hope you aren't offended. It wasn't conscious, I've just looked at your paintings a lot - it would have been difficult for you to have avoided influencing me entirely :)
no subject
on 2006-11-25 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 06:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Posted by (Anonymous) - on 2006-11-26 12:36 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted byno subject
on 2006-11-25 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 06:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted byno subject
on 2006-11-25 07:03 pm (UTC)I like this one by the way, I actually like that the sky is reversed, I hadn't noticed until you mentioned it, I just thought it looked rather good.
xxx
no subject
on 2006-11-25 07:23 pm (UTC)In other words - I knew that CCK exhibited fetish art, and have been planning to do fetish art for a while anyway (if nothing else, so I can build up a client base within the scene, since I meet so many people through my other work), but it's not very high on my list of priorities.
By "reasonable cost" do you mean "drastically overpriced to cover their enormous cut"? Cause one of the reasons I'm not pushing to get an exhibition is to avoid losing a slice of my earnings to a gallery, and another reason is that galleries, like the property market, believe in taking the piss with pricing, selling things for as much as they can possibly get away with. I don't believe in underselling other artists, but I do believe that original art should be sold for what it's worth, which is less than most galleries sell it for. I'd much rather be my own merchant for as long as I can.
(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted byno subject
on 2006-11-25 07:24 pm (UTC)The shadows look like mimi (http://images.google.co.uk/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=mimi+aboriginal&btnG=Search) spirits, on holiday a long way from home.
no subject
on 2006-11-25 07:27 pm (UTC)Mmmm, that's exactly the kind of thing I was referencing. I think I had the shadow theatre which Artaud writes about in my head, among other things.
(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted byno subject
on 2006-11-25 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 07:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted byno subject
on 2006-11-25 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 08:42 pm (UTC)I think the robed figure has been excluded from the ritual, he's lonely but still watches and waits.
:-)
no subject
on 2006-11-26 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-25 09:03 pm (UTC)the stars are really gorgeous. and the trees. but the tents kind of jars. but i have a very odd sense of art i think. i think i am just anti-orange. (and maybe once i have a house to put one in i will ask you to paint a washy Ico-inspired painting for me. that would be so cool.)
no subject
on 2006-11-25 10:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted by(no subject)
Posted byno subject
on 2006-11-26 12:56 pm (UTC)Ico as in this (http://www.icothegame.com/en_GB/index.htm)?
(no subject)
Posted byno subject
on 2006-11-26 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
on 2006-11-26 01:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Posted byno subject
on 2006-11-27 11:19 am (UTC)Erm, yes. Are you wanting to exhibit at all in the next year or so? I've already put in a good word for you with the foh manager at the Orange Tree - we exhibit a different artist in the Attenborough room (where people drink their drinkies that's not the bar) for each show. He's always on the look out for new artists, our clientele includes some rather wealthy people (being Richmond) and I believe the commission taken if we sell anything for you is unusually small. We've been known to sell things straight off the wall in the interval of a play, apparently. :-)
Anyhoo. John told me that if you want to send him a portfolio anytime, or call in/phone up for a chat, then this would be a good thing.
no subject
on 2006-11-27 02:16 pm (UTC)But yes! This sounds like a fantastic opportunity, and thankyou so much for thinking of me :)
no subject
on 2006-11-27 11:37 am (UTC)As such, the dwellers themselves are entirely oblivious to his presence, and this is just as well, as were they to see him and recognise him then it would not only have a dampening effect on their joy but it might cause a divergence from their destined path.
I'm caught up, not only in wanting to know what the next chapter of their story is but also what the story has been up to this point. What's so important that the embodiment of Fate feels it necessary to take such a personal interest?
no subject
on 2006-11-27 02:22 pm (UTC)And surely everything is important to Destiny? It seems to me that if the tent does represent life/creation, it represents the very normality of its beauty?
no subject
on 2006-12-08 11:01 pm (UTC)